Controversy analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Controversy analysis - Essay ExampleThis essay reviews five articles on peeing scarcity and what they say or not say about effluent management. Since peeing supply scarcity is growing day by day, being an important cause of the issue, can improvement in wastewater management help in solving the problem? As early as 1955, Packman argued that water scarcity is a national issue and must be resolved through policymaking, before it in earnest derails the development of America, in the article, Water for the Future. He is an important source of information because he has presented an issue that not many reporters analyze and discuss during his time. Packman blames human mismanagement and the uneven distribution of fresh plant and surface water for water issues. He claims that the government and private sector should look into supporting various options to properly manage water scarcity, and these are 1) efficient management of existing water resources 2) reusing water, including waste water 3) increase water supply through artificial rain production and 4) improving research on water desalination. The strengths of the article are the use of authoritative sources and the emphasis on the issue and how to resolve it. backpacker employs various(a) credible articles to support his statements. For instance, he says Measures to combat water shortages must be based on retainer of the fact that water, unlike other resources, cannot be saved by non-use. He supports this claim by providing endorse The conservation of water is not so much the saving of a decreasing supply for some great need in the future, as, for example, the storing of natural gas, but the control and use of water to the optimum advantage of all. Packer gives proper in-text citation for his claims. Moreover, Packer effectively uses logos that can bring attention to urgency of water shortage. He underscores that water shortage is a reality, and to not manage water through different ways will result to developmental and health catastrophes in the future. The weakness of the article is its lack of conclusion. Packer shortly ends the article after discussing policy issues. He should have summarized his findings and discussed the implications of the policies and resolutions he proposed to increase the effectiveness of his argument. In spheric Water Shortages, Mary H. Cooper expands the political implications of water shortages that Packard mentioned, and where she argues that the next wars and conflicts will not revolve or so oil, but water, because of its scarcity and increasing demand from people of different nations and communities. She is an important source because she specializes in environmental, force and defense issues (CQ Researcher). Before she joined The CQ Researcher as a staff writer in 1983, she worked as a reporter and Washington correspondent for the Rome daily newspaper lUnita (CQ Researcher). Cooper claims that one of the roughly pressing underlying causes of t erritorial disputes is the shortage of water. Since countries are sharing water sources, they are doing everything they can to support this basic need. She includes